Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Popular stocks

Crypto

CFD

Currencies

Support

Gold

Home » Crypto Market News » Silvergate Bank’s Liquidation: The Impact of Regulatory Pressure on Crypto Banking

Silvergate Bank’s Liquidation: The Impact of Regulatory Pressure on Crypto Banking

  • September 26, 2024
  • 105

Silvergate Bank, once a pivotal institution in the cryptocurrency sector, faced a forced voluntary liquidation primarily due to pressure from U.S. regulators, according to industry analysts. This assertion highlights the impact of governmental actions on the crypto banking landscape. An industry executive suggested that the bank could have navigated its financial difficulties and emerged stable had it not been for state-imposed restrictions on crypto deposits.

Reports indicate that during discussions with Silvergate, officials from the Biden administration mandated the bank to limit its cryptocurrency-related deposits to 15%. Failure to comply would have resulted in significant repercussions. This situation is perceived by some as part of a broader initiative, often referred to as “Operation Choke Point 2.0,” which aims to curtail the operations of financial institutions involved with the crypto sector. Many believe that this covert governmental regulatory pressure exacerbated the banking crisis experienced in 2023, echoing events from the financial crisis of 2008.

The reliance of digital asset firms on traditional banking services has become increasingly evident, particularly as they sought ways to manage deposits and facilitate customer transactions. Silvergate was not alone; other banks like Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank, both of which were known for their cryptocurrency ties, also succumbed to regulatory challenges.

Insiders have mentioned that Silvergate faced an ultimatum regarding the 15% deposit cap. Compliance became imperative as the regulatory landscape grew hostile. The decision for voluntary liquidation, rather than entering receivership with the FDIC, raised eyebrows among observers, as such an event is uncommon in banking history.

Despite Silvergate’s struggles, recent recoveries within the crypto market suggest that the bank could have remained viable. Acknowledging past mistakes in regulatory compliance, experts argue that the bank did not deserve to be pressured out of the market. These events occur against a backdrop of political discussions around the United States maintaining its leadership position in emerging technologies, such as blockchain and artificial intelligence.

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.